---
id: arthur-schopenhauer
recordStatus: draft
liveStatus: new
type: person
title: Arthur Schopenhauer
titleEn: Arthur Schopenhauer
titleRu: Артур Шопенгауэр
nameAlternatives: []
description: "German philosopher (1788–1860), named thirteen times in A Confession (1879–82)."
birthDate: "1788-02-22"
birthDateOldStyle: ""
birthDateApproximate: false
deathDate: "1860-09-21"
deathDateOldStyle: ""
deathDateApproximate: false
birthPlace: ""
deathPlace: ""
nationality: German
roles:
  - author read by Tolstoy
occupation:
  - philosopher
relationToTolstoy: ""
relationshipDescription: "A philosopher Tolstoy read in German and quotes in A Confession."
periodOfContact:
  from: ""
  to: ""
  notes: ""
synopsis: ""
relatedWorks:
  -
    id: confession
    role: quoted author
relatedArticles:
  - leo-tolstoy
  - immanuel-kant
  - solomon
  - socrates
  - buddha
themes:
  - philosophy and the question of life
identifiers:
  wikidata: Q38193
  viaf: ""
  lccn: ""
  bnf: ""
fieldSources:
  birthDate:
    -
      sourceId: tolstoydigital-tei
      volume: ""
      page: ""
      notes: "personList.xml, person 15729."
  deathDate:
    -
      sourceId: tolstoydigital-tei
      volume: ""
      page: ""
      notes: "personList.xml, person 15729."
---

Arthur Schopenhauer (<span lang="ru">Артур Шопенгауэр</span>; 1788–1860) was a German philosopher.[^1]

## In A Confession

Schopenhauer is named thirteen times in [[A Confession]] (<span lang="ru">Исповедь</span>, 1879–82). The plan on the cover of the first draft already has him: "I look round at my contemporaries. Solomon, Schopenhauer."[^2]

- **Chapter VI.** True philosophy, "not that which Schopenhauer calls 'professorial philosophy'", gives one answer to the question of life, the answer given by [[Socrates]], Schopenhauer, [[Solomon]] and the [[Buddha]] (VI.10).[^3] Tolstoy then quotes each of them. The long Schopenhauer passage (VI.13) is from the closing section, § 71, of *The World as Will and Representation*; Tolstoy read the book in German and the translation is his own.[^4] A shorter saying follows in VI.23: "Life is that which should not be — an evil; and the passage into Nothingness is the only good in life."[^5]
- **Chapter VII.** People who live in ignorance "have not yet understood that question of life which presented itself to Schopenhauer, Solomon, and Buddha" (VII.4). The fourth of the four ways out is "to live like Solomon and Schopenhauer": to know that life is a stupid joke and still go on living (VII.11). Tolstoy places himself there.[^6]
- **Chapter VIII.** Looking back: "in the delusion of my pride of intellect it seemed to me so indubitable that I and Solomon and Schopenhauer had stated the question so truly and exactly that nothing else was possible" (VIII.3).[^7]
- **Chapter IX.** At first knowledge seemed to give a positive reply, "the reply of Schopenhauer: that life has no meaning and is an evil". Strictly expressed, as by the Brahmins, Solomon and Schopenhauer, the reply is only "indefinite, or an identity: 0 equals 0" (IX.7).[^8] His position "with Schopenhauer and Solomon" was stupid: they understood life to be an evil and went on living (IX.22).
- **Chapter X.** It was not that he, Solomon and Schopenhauer had not killed themselves that convinced him faith exists, but that the milliards of ordinary people lived (X.8).
- **Chapter XII.** He "went over in [his] mind the arguments of Kant and Schopenhauer showing the impossibility of proving the existence of a God", and began to refute them (XII.4).[^9] See [On proving God](#on-proving-god) below, and [[Immanuel Kant]].

## Will to live {#will-to-live}

*Wille zum Leben*, "will to live", is the term Tolstoy keeps in German inside his own translation in VI.13. In that passage it is what resists the passage into nothingness: "our nature, is only that same wish to live — *Wille zum Leben* — which forms ourselves as well as our world."[^10]

## On proving God {#on-proving-god}

The PSS commentary to XII.4 points to the places where Schopenhauer examines the proofs of God's existence: *On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason*, chapter 2, §§ 7–8, and chapter 4, § 20.[^11] In outline (general scholarship, not from these sources): he argues that the proofs misuse the principle that everything has a reason or cause, by applying it until it reaches a first cause and then dropping it there.

## Open questions

- In VII.18 the Russian has "Nobody prevents us, with Schopenhauer, from denying life".[^12] Both Wiener and Maude leave out "with Schopenhauer". Whether their Russian text lacked the words, as at other places where they agree against the PSS, is not checked.
- The PSS commentary to VI.10 cites Fet's Russian translation of *The World as Will and Representation* for the preface on professorial philosophy, but says that Tolstoy read the book in the original.[^13] When he first read it is not shown by these sources.
- The outline in *On proving God* is general scholarship and should be checked against the *Fourfold Root* before the page goes live.

## Dive provenance

- [1879-1882-a-confession](../works/non-fiction/personal-papers/1879-1882-a-confession/index.md) — the text of A Confession (PSS 23:1–59) and its commentary (PSS 23:515–537); Johan's reader notes of 10 October 2026 asked for this page.

[^1]: <span lang="ru">«Немецкий философ»</span> (Tolstoy Digital, `personList.xml`, person 15729: 1788–1860).

[^2]: <span lang="ru">«Оглядываюсь на сверстных. Соломон, Шопенгауэр»</span> (PSS 23:519, commentary, the plan on the cover of the first draft). English: ours.

[^3]: <span lang="ru">«не в той, которую Шопенгауэр называл профессорской философией»</span>; <span lang="ru">«ответ, данный Сократом, Шопенгауэром, Соломоном, Буддой»</span> (PSS 23:22, ch. VI). English: Maude.

[^4]: <span lang="ru">«Выдержка взята из заключительного (71) параграфа сочинения Артура Шопенгауэра „Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung“ („Мир как воля и представление“). Толстой читал его в оригинале; перевод принадлежит ему»</span> (PSS 23:533, commentary, note 25). English: ours.

[^5]: <span lang="ru">«Жизнь есть то, чего не должно бы быть, — зло, и переход в ничто есть единственное благо жизни», говорит Шопенгауэр</span> (PSS 23:26, ch. VI). English: Maude.

[^6]: <span lang="ru">«Четвертый выход — жить в положении Соломона, Шопенгауэра — знать, что жизнь есть глупая, сыгранная надо мною шутка, и все-таки жить»</span>; <span lang="ru">«Это было для меня отвратительно, мучительно, но я оставался в этом положении»</span> (PSS 23:29, ch. VII). English: Maude.

[^7]: <span lang="ru">«В заблуждении гордости своего ума мне так казалось несомненным, что мы с Соломоном и Шопенгауэром поставили вопрос так верно и истинно, что другого ничего быть не может»</span> (PSS 23:32, ch. VIII). English: Maude.

[^8]: <span lang="ru">«ответ Шопенгауэра: жизнь не имеет смысла, она есть зло»</span>; <span lang="ru">«есть только ответ неопределенный, или тожество: 0 = 0»</span> (PSS 23:34, ch. IX). English: Maude.

[^9]: <span lang="ru">«То я проверял в уме доводы Канта и Шопенгауэра о невозможности доказательства бытия божия, то я начинал опровергать их»</span> (PSS 23:44, ch. XII). English: Maude.

[^10]: <span lang="ru">«наша природа есть ведь только эта самая воля к существованию (Wille zum Leben), составляющая нас самих, как и наш мир»</span> (PSS 23:23, ch. VI). English: Maude.

[^11]: <span lang="ru">«Шопенгауэр рассматривает доказательства бытия божия в своем сочинении: „Ueber die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grund“ („О четверояком корне закона достаточного основания“), гл. вторая, §§ 7, 8; гл. четвертая, § 20»</span> (PSS 23:534, commentary, note 32). English: ours.

[^12]: <span lang="ru">«Никто не мешает нам с Шопенгауэром отрицать жизнь»</span> (PSS 23:30, ch. VII). English: ours.

[^13]: <span lang="ru">«См. в русском переводе А. Фета, изд. Маркса, 4-е, СПб., стр. XXV—XXVIII»</span> (PSS 23:533, commentary, note 23). English: ours.